It
is time some one asked the Government to lay down all the facts on the
table so that the public would know what is happening behind its back.
Robbing Peter to pay Paul is not secularism. And temples are not for
looting, under any name. One thought that Mohammad of Ghazni has long
been dead.
WHILE
Congress leaders are hell-bent on damning the RSS – it is an old game
that has long ceased to have any meaning – they seem to be unaware (or
deliberately wish to ignore) that as late as on July 4, 2010 the right
hand of a 53-year old Christian college professor (one TJ Joseph) was
chopped off by Muslim fundamentalists, at Thodapurzha, Iduki district,
in Kerala, for alleged blasphemy.
Digvijay
Singh probably doesn’t want to be reminded of this. Nor, one suspects,
would he be anxious to know that police found out that this heinous
crime was committed as part of the implementation
of the verdict of a Shariah court run by fundamentalist elements in
Kerala. The police apparently discovered that 14 such parallel courts
have been running in Kerala for the last twenty years and Kerala State
Home Minister Kodiyeri Balakrishnan has been reported as confessing that
since 1993, twenty two murders have taken place under the direction of
the Shariah courts in Kerala (vide, Mangalam Daily Kottayam, July 21,
2010).
Digvijay
Singh can check this bit of information as could Rahul Gandhi. At the
same time, they could both check out on the performance of The Hindu
Religious and Charitable Endowment Act of 1951 which allows State
Governments and politicians to take over thousands of Hindu Temples and
maintain complete control over them and their properties. It is claimed
that they can sell the temple assets and properties and use the money in
any way they choose.
A charge has been made not by any Temple authority, but by a foreign writer, Stephen Knapp in a book (Crimes Against India and
the Need to Protect Ancient Vedic Tradition) published in the United
States that makes shocking reading. Hundreds of temples in centuries
past have been built in India by devout rulers and the donations given
to them by devotees have been used for the benefit of the people.
If,
presently, money collected has ever been misused (and that word needs
to be defined), it is for the devotees to protest and not for any
government to interfere. This letter is what has been happening
currently under an intrusive law. It would seem, for instance,that
under a Temple Empowerment Act, about 43,000 temples in Andhra Pradesh
have come under government control and only 18 per cent of the revenue
of these temples have been returned for temple purposes, the remaining
82 per cent being used for purposes unstated.
Apparently even the world famous Tirumala Tirupati Temple has
not been spared. According to Knapp, the temple collects over Rs 3,100
crores every year “and the State Government has not denied the charge
that as much as 85 per cent of this is transferred to the State
Exchequer, much of which goes to causes that are not connected with the
Hindu community”. Was it for that reason that devotees make their
offering to the temples? Another charge that has been made is that the Andhra
Government has also allowed the demolition of at least ten temples for
the construction of a golf course. “Imagine the outcry” writes Knapp,
“if ten mosques had been demolished”. It would seem that in Karanataka,
Rs. 79 crores were collected from about two lakh temples and from that,
temples received Rs seven crores for their maintenance, Muslim
Madrassahs and Haj subsidy were given Rs 59 crore and churches about Rs
13 crore. Very generous of
the government. Because of this, Knapp writes, “25 per cent of the two
lakh temples or about 50,000 temples in Karnataka will be closed down
for lack of resources”, and he adds: “The only way the government can
continue to do this is because people have not stood up enough to stop
it”. Knapp then refers to Kerala
where, he says, “funds from the Guruvayur Temple are diverted to other
government projects denying improvement to 45 Hindu temples”. Land
belonging to the Ayyappa Temple, apparently has been grabbed and “Church
encroaches are occupying huge areas of forest land, running into
thousands of acres, near Sabarimala”.
A
charge is made that the Communist state government of Kerala…. wants to
pass an Ordinance to disband the Travancore & Cochin Autonomous
Devaswom Boards (TCDBs) and take over their limited independent
authority of 1,800 Hindu temples. If what the author says is true, even
the Maharashtra Government
wants to take over some 450,000 temples in the state which would
“supply a huge amount of revenue to correct the state’s bankrupt
conditions….” And to top it all, Knapp says that in
Orissa, the state government intends to sell over 70,000 acres of
endowment lands from the Jagannath Temple, the proceeds of which would
solve a huge financial crunch brought about by its own mismanagement of
temple assets. Says Knapp: “Why such occurrences are so often not known is that the Indian
media, especially the English television and press, are often
anti-Hindu in their approach, and thus not inclined to give much
coverage, and certainly no sympathy, for anything that may affect the
Hindu community. Therefore, such government actions that play
against the Hindu community go on without much or any attention
attracted to them”.
Knapp
obviously is on record. If the facts produced by him are incorrect, it
is up to the government to say so. It is quite possible that some
individuals might have set up temples to deal with lucrative earnings.
But that, surely, is none of the government’s business? Instead of
taking over all earnings, the government surely can appoint local
committees to look into temple affairs so that the amount discovered is
fairly used for the public good? Says Knapp: “Nowhere
in the free, democratic world are the religious institutions managed,
maligned and controlled by the government, thus denying the religious
freedom of the people of the country. But it is happening in India.
Government officials have taken control of Hindu temples because they
smell money in them, they recognise the indifference of Hindus, they are
aware of the unlimited patience and tolerance of Hindus, they also know
that it is not in the blood of Hindus to go to the streets to
demonstrate, destroy property, threaten, loot, harm and kill…
No comments:
Post a Comment